Use of "Future"

[Gervase Markham]

Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> Well, as I said, I think the solution to that part of the problem is
> providing a strong "target" concept for future releases (2.20 could be
> mod_perl and cleanups and user-facing templatization, 
...

Surely this is exactly what we've moved away from with date-based releases?

IMO, we need some way for people (including us) to get an idea of what 
is currently planned to be fixed in the next milestone. The "Milestone" 
field seems a good choice for this. Ideally, the number of bugs planned 
for 2.20 (for example), should start at X and decline gradually to zero 
about six months later.

Gerv