Accessibility and Bugzilla
Gervase Markham
gerv at mozilla.org
Thu Jul 22 19:31:28 UTC 2004
Joel Peshkin wrote:
>
> All:
>
> After playing with the developers toolbar, the question of
> accessibility for the disabled piqued my interest. We do not appear to
> be very far off right now. Many of the practices we use just for good
> w3c validation and compatibility get us about 90% of the way to passing
> accessibility checks.
>
> This represents an opportunity to continue to differentiate Bugzilla.
> I am considering pushing towards passing the disabled access audits for
> 2.20. Should we take that on??
>
> There is a fine tutorial at http://www.jimthatcher.com/webcourse1.htm
> and I believe that the biggest impact to the Bugzilla code is descibed
> in http://www.jimthatcher.com/webcourse8.htm
>
> By and large, it seems that the biggest change is we would need to
> change...
<snip>
Actually, quite a bit of this is done - someone went on a spree a while
ago, although I don't know how extensive it was.
> and we would have to make sure we add alt tags to all graphics (the
> purely decorative ones get alt="")
Do we have any that _aren't_ purely decorative? OK, we have dep graphs
and charts, but you can't really describe their contents in text.
Gerv
More information about the developers
mailing list