[Analysis] Templates: The good, the bad, the ugly
chicks at chicks.net
Wed Dec 8 14:50:40 UTC 2004
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Jake wrote:
> It's entirely possible that after a round of discussion we would have
> came to right where we are now (eg, using the Template Toolkit).
Agreed. My vote would be for Apache::ASP over TT, but TT would obviously
have been a contender because of its popularity if not because of its
elegance. :) Mason and HTML::Template would probably round out the real
> All I was suggesting here is that it would have been nice to have had
> that discussion *before* anything went in.
Lack of discussion isn't generally a problem in these parts. TT is sort
of an obvious choice on a few levels so the lack of discussion may have
just been because folks agreed it was a good choice/direction. I've made
the same "mistake" and I still maintain apps using it so I
> I actually find it kinda funny that out of everything I said, this is
> the only part that got any response... :)
That means we agreed with the rest of it, right? And I respnded to every
last word this time. :)
"Fans of Mozilla's free, open-source Firefox browser make the
ardent Apple faithful look like a bunch of slackers."
- Rebecca Lieb at clickz.com
More information about the developers