From justdave at bugzilla.org Sat Nov 1 09:27:15 2003 From: justdave at bugzilla.org (David Miller) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 04:27:15 -0500 Subject: Error in Post_bug.cgi line 303 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 10/31/2003 11:54 AM -0500, David Miller wrote: > You can either grab the patch off that bug, or download 2.16.4 when it gets > posted this afternoon. And just in case anyone's following along, trick-or-treating and some last-minute stuff for work kinda got in the way this afternoon/evening. There's a fair amount of stuff that has to be done yet (getting the appropriate web pages queued for update on the website, getting some last minute documentation changes checked in, etc) but we're within a few hours of being ready to go, and I'm running out of steam for tonight. So it'll happen some time on Saturday :) -- Dave Miller Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System http://www.justdave.net/ http://www.bugzilla.org/ From jpyeron at pyerotechnics.com Sat Nov 1 21:21:41 2003 From: jpyeron at pyerotechnics.com (Jason Pyeron) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 16:21:41 -0500 (EST) Subject: bit rot waiting to happen... Message-ID: what needs to happen from approval of a patch to checkin? http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208714 also what is the story on custom resolutions / status? Jason Pyeron -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron http://www.pyerotechnics.com - - Partner & Sr. Manager Pyerotechnics Development, Inc. - - 500 West University Parkway #1S - - +1 (410) 808-6646 Baltimore, Maryland 21210-3253 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, purge the message from your system and notify the sender immediately. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. From justdave at bugzilla.org Sat Nov 1 21:43:49 2003 From: justdave at bugzilla.org (David Miller) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 16:43:49 -0500 Subject: bit rot waiting to happen... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 11/1/2003 4:21 PM -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote: > what needs to happen from approval of a patch to checkin? Someone with write access to cvs checks it in. > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208714 But it hasn't been approved yet. In fact, the current version of the patch on that bug hasn't been reviewed yet. It has a review? flag set. Pester the requestee or request it from someone else. > also what is the story on custom resolutions / status? There's been lots of ideas posted. It's waiting for someone to write code. -- Dave Miller Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System http://www.justdave.net/ http://www.bugzilla.org/ From gerv at mozilla.org Sat Nov 1 22:13:36 2003 From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham) Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 22:13:36 +0000 Subject: POST_ and PRE_CHOMP? In-Reply-To: <20031027175643.GA2206@async.com.br> References: <20031027175643.GA2206@async.com.br> Message-ID: <3FA43010.1080807@mozilla.org> Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > Why are our templates PRE_CHOMP by default? It's a lot more tricky for > lines that end in template commands, isn't it? When we initially wrote the first templates, we did some experimenting. We wrote some templates in the style we wanted to use, and then tried PRE, POST, both and neither to see which produced the nicer-looking HTML. The answer was PRE. Turning both on makes it all one line (basically), and having none leaves too much whitespace and general ugliness. All of the current templates are written such that PRE does the right thing - I don't think we can change it now. > Also, since POST_CHOMP isn't defined anywhere, does it default to off or > on? off. Gerv From gerv at mozilla.org Sat Nov 1 23:24:07 2003 From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham) Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 23:24:07 +0000 Subject: Licensing issues In-Reply-To: <20031027004134.GA2203@async.com.br> References: <20031027004134.GA2203@async.com.br> Message-ID: <3FA44097.2010806@mozilla.org> Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > This is probably Gerv's territory; I would like to know what the > current policy is for assigning copyright to: Your question is loosely worded; do you mean "what is the value to use for 'initial developer'"? > 1. Files created resulting from templatization. They should have the same initial developer as the original CGI. > 2. Entirely new files contributed to Bugzilla.jn They should have the initial developer set to the, er, initial developer of the file :-) In practice, as far as I can see, there's very little legal difference in the MPL between someone who is the Initial Developer and someone who is a Contributor. So it's nothing to worry about massively. Note that there is no "assigning copyright" (from your original question) ever involved in licensing files under the MPL or the tri-license, or contributing them to Bugzilla; the person who wrote a particular file or code fragment always retains copyright on it. Gerv From chicks at chicks.net Mon Nov 3 23:11:33 2003 From: chicks at chicks.net (Christopher Hicks) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 18:11:33 -0500 (EST) Subject: longdescs no pk? Message-ID: (1) Why doesn't the longdesc table have a primary key? (2) Would there be any harm in putting an autoincrement key or something in there? I can't think of any reason why it would, but my imagination is currently unusually limited by the sensory overload of being at an insurance conference at the Opryland. I wish I was kidding. :) (3) Is there a preferred official solution to this? It would seem like a primary key across bug_id,who,bug_when would also work. That's not as 'neat and clean' to store for my purposes, but if that's the official answer I'll go with it. I first noticed this when I was trying to hand edit some old comments using Mysqltool. (bad bad i know.) But now I'm trying to track which bugs have been billed and which haven't and a primary key, any primary key, would make that a whole lot easier. Any help on this would be appreciated. I have't researched this as thoroughly as I'd like because I'm stuck in a hotel without Internet. Ugh! I hate modems. -- Writing about music is like dancing about architecture. From gerv at mozilla.org Mon Nov 3 22:40:25 2003 From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 22:40:25 +0000 Subject: The Bugzilla website needs an overhaul In-Reply-To: <3F9C7F69.40702@oregonstate.edu> References: <3F9568B2.2040005@bugopolis.com> <3F9841EC.20704@mozilla.org> <3F984CE7.3060406@oregonstate.edu> <3F9C7F69.40702@oregonstate.edu> Message-ID: <3FA6D959.9020906@mozilla.org> michael joseph morgan wrote: > http://oregonstate.edu/~morgamic/bugzilla/ > > Worked with the Mozilla beta site, tweaked a few style elements in > default.css, added the blue theme, drummed up a banner image (which most > of you will probably hate, :D) and added some content based on what's on > bugzilla.org's about page. This is pretty good :-) A few thoughts: - We definitely don't want screeds of text on the front page. I've never liked the patronising tone of that bit of text which begins 'Bugzilla is one example of a class of programs called "Defect Tracking Systems"' anyway. - We need to choose a flipping logo and be done with it! :-) - News shouldn't be at the bottom of the left hand sidebar (it's probably moving in website-beta as well.) It's far too hidden. - The first paragraph is too close to the "About Bugzilla" title. - The search box's "raised" look is very odd. Gerv From bugreport at peshkin.net Mon Nov 3 23:14:18 2003 From: bugreport at peshkin.net (Joel Peshkin) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 15:14:18 -0800 Subject: longdescs no pk? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3FA6E14A.6080909@peshkin.net> Christopher Hicks wrote: >(1) Why doesn't the longdesc table have a primary key? > >(2) Would there be any harm in putting an autoincrement key or something >in there? I can't think of any reason why it would, but my imagination is >currently unusually limited by the sensory overload of being at an >insurance conference at the Opryland. I wish I was kidding. :) > >(3) Is there a preferred official solution to this? It would seem like a >primary key across bug_id,who,bug_when would also work. That's not as >'neat and clean' to store for my purposes, but if that's the official >answer I'll go with it. > > I'd prefer #2. That will also help with people who use M$ACCESS to front-end the DB for special reports while preserving my right to make multiple comments to the same bug within the same second. That key could even turn out to be useful eventually. -Joel From jon at vmware.com Tue Nov 4 02:21:38 2003 From: jon at vmware.com (Jonathan Schatz) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 18:21:38 -0800 Subject: sql query question? Message-ID: <4F28105F70F4324A8723F0C949088941085743@pa-exch5.vmware.com> i've hit a wall trying to generate a report for my manager and i figured i'd ask here. for a given range of dates, i need a list of bugs that were filed with a particular target_milestone. this seems like it should be easy enough to do with one query against 2 tables (bugs, bugs_activity), but everything i've come up with has hung my mysql server. i've written a program to do this with many queries, and at least i have results to give my boss, but i feel stupid for not being able to come up with the correct magic query. any ideas? -jon -- Jonathan Schatz Engineering System Administrator VMware, Inc "Te occidere possunt sed te edere non possunt nefas est." From bbaetz at acm.org Tue Nov 4 09:12:34 2003 From: bbaetz at acm.org (Bradley Baetz) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 20:12:34 +1100 Subject: longdescs no pk? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20031104091234.GA1620@mango.home> Theres a bug somewhere on comments being swtiched arround daylight saving, because the second 2:30am is 'earlier' than 3am. I'd prefer a PK of (bug#, comment#), since that makes it easy to get the current comment nyumbers, so we could display them on teh midair checkin list, in emails, and so on. Bradley From Ron.Loxton at earthtech.ca Tue Nov 4 12:23:20 2003 From: Ron.Loxton at earthtech.ca (Loxton, Ron) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 07:23:20 -0500 Subject: sql query question? Message-ID: Jon: Can you post the query? Ron -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Schatz [mailto:jon at vmware.com] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:22 PM To: developers at bugzilla.org Subject: sql query question? i've hit a wall trying to generate a report for my manager and i figured i'd ask here. for a given range of dates, i need a list of bugs that were filed with a particular target_milestone. this seems like it should be easy enough to do with one query against 2 tables (bugs, bugs_activity), but everything i've come up with has hung my mysql server. i've written a program to do this with many queries, and at least i have results to give my boss, but i feel stupid for not being able to come up with the correct magic query. any ideas? -jon -- Jonathan Schatz Engineering System Administrator VMware, Inc "Te occidere possunt sed te edere non possunt nefas est." - To view or change your list settings, click here: From kiko at async.com.br Wed Nov 5 00:03:31 2003 From: kiko at async.com.br (Christian Robottom Reis) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 22:03:31 -0200 Subject: POST_ and PRE_CHOMP? In-Reply-To: <3FA43010.1080807@mozilla.org> References: <20031027175643.GA2206@async.com.br> <3FA43010.1080807@mozilla.org> Message-ID: <20031105000331.GJ1715@async.com.br> On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 10:13:36PM +0000, Gervase Markham wrote: > Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > >Why are our templates PRE_CHOMP by default? It's a lot more tricky for > >lines that end in template commands, isn't it? > > When we initially wrote the first templates, we did some experimenting. > We wrote some templates in the style we wanted to use, and then tried > PRE, POST, both and neither to see which produced the nicer-looking > HTML. The answer was PRE. Well, if I understand *_CHOMP correctly, both seem to be a serious gotcha when writing a template, so correct me if I'm wrong: POST_CHOMP will bite you if you have something like: foo bar [% noogie %] baz ramming the value of noogie into baz. PRE_CHOMP will bite you if you have something like: Foo bar baz [% noogie %] ramming baz into the content of noogie. > Turning both on makes it all one line (basically), and having none > leaves too much whitespace and general ugliness. All of the current > templates are written such that PRE does the right thing - I don't think > we can change it now. I recently reviewing a patch by Josh that fixed a problem that resulted from PRE_CHOMP eating up whitespace in an error message: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217219 The line in question was: - [% prod FILTER html %] product, but you are trying to use - [% votes FILTER html %]. which (AIUI) rammed votes into "use". Is this expected? Take care, -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 From timeless at myrealbox.com Wed Nov 5 16:34:03 2003 From: timeless at myrealbox.com (timeless) Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 11:34:03 -0500 Subject: Create Attachments on the local filesystem In-Reply-To: <3F96815D.4060404@peshkin.net> References: <3F95027C.8080709@mozilla.org> <3F96815D.4060404@peshkin.net> Message-ID: <3FA9267B.5080107@myrealbox.com> Joel Peshkin wrote: > 4) I don't care if I cannot search the attachment contents if the > attachment is > 16MB. I never need to do that. heh. my mailbox is about 400mkb, and i do search the entire thing occasionally. i also do full comment queries looking for stack signatures, i'd probably do that on core files too. From rami.barsoum at memscap.com Tue Nov 4 12:29:02 2003 From: rami.barsoum at memscap.com (Rami Barsoum) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 14:29:02 +0200 Subject: Bugzilla Database Message-ID: <3FA79B8E.9020200@memscap.com> Hi All, I have a small problem, i'm sure that someone has faced it before. I want to merge two bugzilla databases in a single database, each database has its own bugs, attachments, users profiles ..etc. Is there a simple way or script to do that? Can anyone help me from where shall i start? And what are the problems that can happen? Thanks, Rami -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rami Barsoum Phone: +20 2 414 6860 x102 System Engineer, Fax: +20 2 414 6492 Information Technology, Email: rami.barsoum at memscap.com MEMScAP Egypt ------------------------------------------------------------------------- "This message and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to any other person." ------------------------------------------------------------------------- From ajiefudan at sina.com Fri Nov 7 03:31:55 2003 From: ajiefudan at sina.com (dingzj) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:31:55 +0800 Subject: {Spam?} Enter Bug Error Message-ID: <019201c3a4df$b9de6d10$714110ac@dingzj> Hi All, I have a problem. When the bugzilla admin enters a new bug to himself,it is ok. Bug when a public user enters a new bug and put the "commit" button, the server spends long time to respond, at last the web returns an Error page. Server error! The server encountered an internal error and was unable to complete your request. Error message: Premature end of script headers: post_bug.cgi If you think this is a server error, please contact the webmaster Error 500 172.16.65.60 Apache/2.0.40 (Red Hat Linux) If I query the bugs, I can find the new bug is reported. What's wrong with the bugzilla? Can anyone help me? Thanks, ajie -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From savdekar at hotmail.com Fri Nov 7 05:18:12 2003 From: savdekar at hotmail.com (Pankaj Savdekar) Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 10:48:12 +0530 Subject: Customization Message-ID: Hi, Can anyone please let me know, where can I get help on customization of bugzilla. I want to do certain customization as 1. Add one email id to CC field always 2. Add some more text boxes etc etc. Thanks in advance, Pankaj _________________________________________________________________ MSN Hotmail now on your Mobile phone. http://server1.msn.co.in/sp03/mobilesms/ Click here. From kiko at async.com.br Fri Nov 7 12:43:42 2003 From: kiko at async.com.br (Christian Robottom Reis) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:43:42 -0200 Subject: {Spam?} Enter Bug Error In-Reply-To: <019201c3a4df$b9de6d10$714110ac@dingzj> References: <019201c3a4df$b9de6d10$714110ac@dingzj> Message-ID: <20031107124342.GC522@async.com.br> On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 11:31:55AM +0800, dingzj wrote: > I have a problem. > When the bugzilla admin enters a new bug to himself,it is ok. > Bug when a public user enters a new bug and put the "commit" button, > the server spends long time to respond, at last the web returns > an Error page. Every time you get a server error, you should look at the webserver error log; it usually contains vital information. Without that it will be hard to diagnose what's wrong. Take care, -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 From kiko at async.com.br Fri Nov 7 12:57:15 2003 From: kiko at async.com.br (Christian Robottom Reis) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:57:15 -0200 Subject: Customization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20031107125715.GA889@async.com.br> On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 10:48:12AM +0530, Pankaj Savdekar wrote: > 1. Add one email id to CC field always http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38922 You can work around this by using a mailing list for your QA or assignees. > 2. Add some more text boxes http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91037 Note that none of the bugs have been integrated in mailing Bugzilla yet. Take care, -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 From kiko at async.com.br Fri Nov 7 13:02:04 2003 From: kiko at async.com.br (Christian Robottom Reis) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:02:04 -0200 Subject: Customization In-Reply-To: <20031107125715.GA889@async.com.br> References: <20031107125715.GA889@async.com.br> Message-ID: <20031107130204.GB889@async.com.br> On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 10:57:15AM -0200, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > Note that none of the bugs have been integrated in mailing Bugzilla yet. s/mailing/mainline/ Take care, -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 From chicks at chicks.net Mon Nov 10 16:17:14 2003 From: chicks at chicks.net (Christopher Hicks) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:17:14 -0500 (EST) Subject: longdescs no pk? In-Reply-To: <20031104091234.GA1620@mango.home> Message-ID: On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Bradley Baetz wrote: > Theres a bug somewhere on comments being swtiched arround daylight > saving, because the second 2:30am is 'earlier' than 3am. I'd prefer a PK > of (bug#, comment#), since that makes it easy to get the current comment > nyumbers, so we could display them on teh midair checkin list, in > emails, and so on. For a minute there I seriously thought I had missed a pre-existing field for comment#. Are you sure you want to start comment numbers over for each bug? The attachments table already uses an auto_increment primary key for instance. To add a field for comment# once would certainly be possible, yet much more challenging than just: alter table longdescs add cid int(10) not null auto_increment primary key; While I'm certainly willing to defer to "authoritative wisdom" and do this the harder way I think a simple is cleaner and considered more holy from a Database Purist perspective. http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=225221 I created a bug for this. Would someone with sufficient power assign it to me? -- No, no, you're not thinking, you're just being logical. -Niels Bohr, physicist (1885-1962) From jlm at TataraSystems.com Mon Nov 10 15:18:52 2003 From: jlm at TataraSystems.com (Jeremy L. Mordkoff) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 10:18:52 -0500 Subject: removing domains from emails/logins Message-ID: <87ED4812394BA14980CC352C3A7483CC47F3AA@tatara.tatarasystems.com> Right now everyone's login ends with '@tatarasystems.com'. I would like to remove that everwhere. I know I have to fix the profiles table and change the preference to allow anything for a name. Do I need to do anything else? Anyone know how to craft a sql query to remove the domain from a field? JLM Jeremy Mordkoff Tatara Systems 978-206-0808 (direct) 978-206-0888 (fax) injustice anywhere threatens justice everywhere -- Dr. Martin Luther King From justdave at bugzilla.org Mon Nov 10 19:30:20 2003 From: justdave at bugzilla.org (David Miller) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:30:20 -0500 Subject: removing domains from emails/logins In-Reply-To: <87ED4812394BA14980CC352C3A7483CC47F3AA@tatara.tatarasystems.com> References: <87ED4812394BA14980CC352C3A7483CC47F3AA@tatara.tatarasystems.com> Message-ID: On 11/10/2003 10:18 AM -0500, Jeremy L. Mordkoff wrote: > Right now everyone's login ends with '@tatarasystems.com'. I would like > to remove that everwhere. I know I have to fix the profiles table and > change the preference to allow anything for a name. Do I need to do > anything else? Anyone know how to craft a sql query to remove the domain > from a field? UPDATE profiles SET login_name = REPLACE(login_name,'@tatarasystems.com',''); -- Dave Miller Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System http://www.justdave.net/ http://www.bugzilla.org/ From lbayes at lukebayes.com Thu Nov 13 07:16:23 2003 From: lbayes at lukebayes.com (Luke Bayes) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 23:16:23 -0800 Subject: Stupid question about rdf / xml? Message-ID: <002401c3a9b6$0e3df7b0$2602a8c0@red> I've been a huge fan of bugzilla for quite a few years now and finally want to make my own mods... I am extremely happy to see the rdf output for bug *lists*... Is there some way that I can get an rdf output for bug details? Or at least for *complete* bug data? Perhaps this has already been built and I just need pointed in the right direction. Been messing with Template Toolkit for 2 days and searching the web all over... Probably with the wrong criteria... Any help would be appreciated. Basically want to build a completely different front end for bugzilla and could do it very easily with full XML output. Thanks, Luke Bayes [lbayes@ || www.] lukebayes.com From tobias.burnus at physik.fu-berlin.de Thu Nov 13 10:20:27 2003 From: tobias.burnus at physik.fu-berlin.de (Tobias Burnus) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:20:27 +0100 Subject: Stupid question about rdf / xml? In-Reply-To: <002401c3a9b6$0e3df7b0$2602a8c0@red> References: <002401c3a9b6$0e3df7b0$2602a8c0@red> Message-ID: <20031113102027.GA31460@physik.fu-berlin.de> Hi, On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:16:23PM -0800, Luke Bayes wrote: > Any help would be appreciated. Basically want to build a completely > different front end for bugzilla and could do it very easily with full > XML output. You know ./xml.cgi, don't you? http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/xml.cgi e.g. http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/xml.cgi?id=1000%2C2467 (%2C is a comma) Can someone enlighten me why http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/xml.cgi?id=1000%2C2467 (comma as separator) and http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/xml.cgi?id=1000+2467 (space as separator) look so different in mozilla while the XML seems to be the same? Tobias From myk at mozilla.org Thu Nov 13 19:45:09 2003 From: myk at mozilla.org (Myk Melez) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:45:09 -0800 Subject: Stupid question about rdf / xml? In-Reply-To: <002401c3a9b6$0e3df7b0$2602a8c0@red> References: <002401c3a9b6$0e3df7b0$2602a8c0@red> Message-ID: <3FB3DF45.3090006@mozilla.org> Luke Bayes wrote: >Any help would be appreciated. Basically want to build a completely >different front end for bugzilla and could do it very easily with full >XML output. > > Note the Bugxula front-end: http://bugxula.mozdev.org/ If that's what you're looking for, your participation in that project would be welcome. :-) -myk From alirette at sandial.com Fri Nov 14 19:52:31 2003 From: alirette at sandial.com (Lirette, Alan) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 14:52:31 -0500 Subject: Charting / Graphing? Message-ID: <2846C23B17DEB94EB11FDD2D6E740F1B977944@nh-fs3.roxtech.com> I have been trying to get Charting and Graphing to work with little success. Im running 2.14 wiht RH 8.0. Sparse documentation on this....Ive loaded all the necessary modules but cant get the Depenency Graph to work. Anyone go a howTo on this? Alan Lirette Engineering 222 International Drive, Suite 125 Portsmouth, NH 03801 alirette at sandial.com < mailto:alirette at sandial.com> P: 603-766-2779 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From justdave at bugzilla.org Fri Nov 14 20:06:47 2003 From: justdave at bugzilla.org (David Miller) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 15:06:47 -0500 Subject: Charting / Graphing? In-Reply-To: <2846C23B17DEB94EB11FDD2D6E740F1B977944@nh-fs3.roxtech.com> References: <2846C23B17DEB94EB11FDD2D6E740F1B977944@nh-fs3.roxtech.com> Message-ID: On 11/14/2003 2:52 PM -0500, Lirette, Alan wrote: > I have been trying to get Charting and Graphing to work with little >success. Im running 2.14 wiht RH 8.0. Sparse documentation on this....Ive >loaded all the necessary modules but cant get the Depenency Graph to work. This question would be better asked on mozilla-webtools at mozilla.org. You should probably re-ask your question there (and this time, include some details, like what you actually get in the browser window when you try it, and what kind of of errors you get in the log, etc. But as long as we're here... The dependency graphing in 2.14.x relies on an external webdot server. The URL provided with the default params that ship with Bugzilla is to a webdot server provided by AT&T Research. It's quite possible their server isn't working. You could try setting up your own webdot server (the software to do it is at http://www.graphviz.org/). Bugzilla 2.16 and later can generate dependency graphs locally without depending on an external server. Unless you have an existing Bugzilla install with lots of local modifications, there's not much excuse to not upgrade, especially if you're on RedHat. Version 2.14 is very old and very unsupported. -- Dave Miller Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System http://www.justdave.net/ http://www.bugzilla.org/ From preed at sigkill.com Fri Nov 14 21:00:13 2003 From: preed at sigkill.com (J. Paul Reed) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 13:00:13 -0800 Subject: Charting / Graphing? In-Reply-To: References: <2846C23B17DEB94EB11FDD2D6E740F1B977944@nh-fs3.roxtech.com> Message-ID: <20031114210013.GA27191@sigkill.com> On 14 Nov 2003 at 15:06:47, David Miller arranged the bits on my disk to say: > The dependency graphing in 2.14.x relies on an external webdot server. > The URL provided with the default params that ship with Bugzilla is to a > webdot server provided by AT&T Research. It's quite possible their > server isn't working. It's also quite possible that the webdot server there is timing out; they've put some pretty tight constraints on the amount of memory and CPU the public webdot server (if it even still exists) will allow to be used, since doing directed graph creation can create intensive use of both. For instance, it won't even graph the simplest of LiveJournal friends graphs without timing out. Later, Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------ J. Paul Reed -- 0xDF8708F8 || preed at sigkill.com || web.sigkill.com/preed Math, my dear boy, is nothing more than the lesbian sister of biology. -- Peter Griffin, Family Guy I use PGP; you should use PGP too... if only to piss off John Ashcroft From justdave at syndicomm.com Sat Nov 15 03:06:27 2003 From: justdave at syndicomm.com (David Miller) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 22:06:27 -0500 Subject: Charting / Graphing? In-Reply-To: <2846C23B17DEB94EB11FDD2D6E740F1B977946@nh-fs3.roxtech.com> References: <2846C23B17DEB94EB11FDD2D6E740F1B977946@nh-fs3.roxtech.com> Message-ID: On 11/14/2003 3:40 PM -0500, Lirette, Alan wrote: > Thanks. I have a ton of cutomization to 2.14. Would it be posible (I >mean easy) to integrate the Graphing/Charting of 2.16 into 2.14? Not really. A lot has changed. -- Dave Miller Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System http://www.justdave.net/ http://www.bugzilla.org/ From kiko at async.com.br Sat Nov 15 19:09:44 2003 From: kiko at async.com.br (Christian Robottom Reis) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 17:09:44 -0200 Subject: Stupid question about rdf / xml? In-Reply-To: <20031113102027.GA31460@physik.fu-berlin.de> References: <002401c3a9b6$0e3df7b0$2602a8c0@red> <20031113102027.GA31460@physik.fu-berlin.de> Message-ID: <20031115190944.GB700@async.com.br> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:20:27AM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote: > Can someone enlighten me why > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/xml.cgi?id=1000%2C2467 > (comma as separator) and > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/xml.cgi?id=1000+2467 > (space as separator) look so different in mozilla > while the XML seems to be the same? What do you mean, Tobias? Both pages look exactly the same in my FB nightly. Take care, -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 From tobias.burnus at physik.fu-berlin.de Mon Nov 17 09:14:34 2003 From: tobias.burnus at physik.fu-berlin.de (Tobias Burnus) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:14:34 +0100 Subject: Stupid question about rdf / xml? In-Reply-To: <20031115190944.GB700@async.com.br> References: <002401c3a9b6$0e3df7b0$2602a8c0@red> <20031113102027.GA31460@physik.fu-berlin.de> <20031115190944.GB700@async.com.br> Message-ID: <20031117091434.GA20196@physik.fu-berlin.de> Hi, On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:09:44PM -0200, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:20:27AM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote: > > Can someone enlighten me why > > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/xml.cgi?id=1000%2C2467 > > (comma as separator) and > > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/xml.cgi?id=1000+2467 > > (space as separator) look so different in mozilla > > while the XML seems to be the same? > What do you mean, Tobias? Both pages look exactly the same in my FB > nightly. In my Mozilla 1.5 they look the same, but in Mozilla 1.2.1 at work the first is displayed with as 'This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. The document tree is shown below.' while the latter is shown as HTML (eating all the ). Quite strange. Tobias From kiko at async.com.br Mon Nov 17 13:29:20 2003 From: kiko at async.com.br (Christian Robottom Reis) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 11:29:20 -0200 Subject: Stupid question about rdf / xml? In-Reply-To: <20031117091434.GA20196@physik.fu-berlin.de> References: <002401c3a9b6$0e3df7b0$2602a8c0@red> <20031113102027.GA31460@physik.fu-berlin.de> <20031115190944.GB700@async.com.br> <20031117091434.GA20196@physik.fu-berlin.de> Message-ID: <20031117132920.GB1447@async.com.br> On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 10:14:34AM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote: > In my Mozilla 1.5 they look the same, but in Mozilla 1.2.1 at work > the first is displayed with as > 'This XML file does not appear to have any style information > associated with it. The document tree is shown below.' > while the latter is shown as HTML (eating all the ). It's odd, because Mozilla 1.2 included the XML prettyprinting feature. Maybe it's broken or turned off in your 1.2.1 build? At any rate, it's definitely a client-side issue. Take care, -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 From meir.hazon at optier.com Mon Nov 17 15:23:00 2003 From: meir.hazon at optier.com (Meir Hazon) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:23:00 +0200 Subject: New Objects,Component,Version Message-ID: <6146938B30D0D311A48E00508B9B19D901195E99@MAIL> Hello All, I think you are all doing a great job. I have installed bugzilla 2.16.4 , how can I create new Objects,Component,Version . The documentation is not clear and I guess refers to other versions of bugzilla. Thank You, Meir. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kiko at async.com.br Mon Nov 17 15:44:42 2003 From: kiko at async.com.br (Christian Robottom Reis) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 13:44:42 -0200 Subject: New Objects,Component,Version In-Reply-To: <6146938B30D0D311A48E00508B9B19D901195E99@MAIL> References: <6146938B30D0D311A48E00508B9B19D901195E99@MAIL> Message-ID: <20031117154442.GE2007@async.com.br> On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 05:23:00PM +0200, Meir Hazon wrote: > I have installed bugzilla 2.16.4 , how can I create new > Objects,Component,Version . If I understood your question correctly, this is done using the administrator interfaces, in particular, editproducts. When logged in as an administrator, the yellow bar at the bottom of the Bugzilla pages has a link "products", which takes you there. > The documentation is not clear and I guess refers to other versions of > bugzilla. It shouldn't be the case, and if you find something inconsistent, please file a documentation bug at bugzilla.mozilla.org; we'll fix it for the next release. Take care, -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 From meir.hazon at optier.com Mon Nov 17 15:53:56 2003 From: meir.hazon at optier.com (Meir Hazon) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:53:56 +0200 Subject: New Objects,Component,Version Message-ID: <6146938B30D0D311A48E00508B9B19D901195E9A@MAIL> Hi, Thank you for the quick reply, How do I get the administrator's interface? I could not find it in : http://www.bugzilla.org/docs216/txt/Bugzilla-Guide.txt Thanks Again, Meir. -----Original Message----- From: Christian Robottom Reis [mailto:kiko at async.com.br] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 5:45 PM To: developers at bugzilla.org Subject: Re: New Objects,Component,Version On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 05:23:00PM +0200, Meir Hazon wrote: > I have installed bugzilla 2.16.4 , how can I create new > Objects,Component,Version . If I understood your question correctly, this is done using the administrator interfaces, in particular, editproducts. When logged in as an administrator, the yellow bar at the bottom of the Bugzilla pages has a link "products", which takes you there. > The documentation is not clear and I guess refers to other versions of > bugzilla. It shouldn't be the case, and if you find something inconsistent, please file a documentation bug at bugzilla.mozilla.org; we'll fix it for the next release. Take care, -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 - To view or change your list settings, click here: From jpyeron at pyerotechnics.com Mon Nov 17 16:04:05 2003 From: jpyeron at pyerotechnics.com (Jason Pyeron) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 11:04:05 -0500 (EST) Subject: New Objects,Component,Version In-Reply-To: <6146938B30D0D311A48E00508B9B19D901195E9A@MAIL> Message-ID: RTFM lines 1770-1773, these question should be posted to the users list. from http://www.bugzilla.org/discussion.html netscape.public.mozilla.webtools - This newsgroup is used for general discussions of all of the Mozilla Webtools, including Bugzilla, Bonsai, Tinderbox, etc. This is the best place for Bugzilla users and administrators of Bugzilla sites to ask for help or share information. This newsgroup is also gatewayed to a mailing list, mozilla-webtools at mozilla.org, which you can subscribe to by mailing mozilla-webtools-request at mozilla.org and putting "subscribe" in the subject line. Searchable archives of this newsgroup are available at groups.google.com. On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Meir Hazon wrote: > Hi, > > > Thank you for the quick reply, > How do I get the administrator's interface? > I could not find it in : > http://www.bugzilla.org/docs216/txt/Bugzilla-Guide.txt > > > Thanks Again, > > > Meir. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Christian Robottom Reis [mailto:kiko at async.com.br] > Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 5:45 PM > To: developers at bugzilla.org > Subject: Re: New Objects,Component,Version > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 05:23:00PM +0200, Meir Hazon wrote: > > I have installed bugzilla 2.16.4 , how can I create new > > Objects,Component,Version . > > If I understood your question correctly, this is done using the > administrator interfaces, in particular, editproducts. When logged in as > an administrator, the yellow bar at the bottom of the Bugzilla pages has > a link "products", which takes you there. > > > The documentation is not clear and I guess refers to other versions of > > bugzilla. > > It shouldn't be the case, and if you find something inconsistent, please > file a documentation bug at bugzilla.mozilla.org; we'll fix it for the > next release. > > Take care, > -- > Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 > - > To view or change your list settings, click here: > > - > To view or change your list settings, click here: > > -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron http://www.pyerotechnics.com - - Partner & Sr. Manager Pyerotechnics Development, Inc. - - +1 (443) 451-2697 500 West University Parkway #1S - - +1 (410) 808-6646 (c) Baltimore, Maryland 21210-3253 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, purge the message from your system and notify the sender immediately. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. From meir.hazon at optier.com Mon Nov 17 16:14:51 2003 From: meir.hazon at optier.com (Meir Hazon) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 18:14:51 +0200 Subject: New Objects,Component,Version Message-ID: <6146938B30D0D311A48E00508B9B19D901195E9B@MAIL> Hi, I did read it : Bugzilla is configured by changing various parameters, accessed from the "Edit parameters" link in the page footer. Here are some of the key parameters on that page. You should run down this list and set them appropriately after installing Bugzilla. Etc... I can't find any where in the index.cfg or related links the "Edit parameters" field. I'm sorry for submitting my request to this list, In the future I will follow your instructions. Thanks, Meir. -----Original Message----- From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:jpyeron at pyerotechnics.com] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 6:04 PM To: 'developers at bugzilla.org' Subject: Re: New Objects,Component,Version RTFM lines 1770-1773, these question should be posted to the users list. from http://www.bugzilla.org/discussion.html netscape.public.mozilla.webtools - This newsgroup is used for general discussions of all of the Mozilla Webtools, including Bugzilla, Bonsai, Tinderbox, etc. This is the best place for Bugzilla users and administrators of Bugzilla sites to ask for help or share information. This newsgroup is also gatewayed to a mailing list, mozilla-webtools at mozilla.org, which you can subscribe to by mailing mozilla-webtools-request at mozilla.org and putting "subscribe" in the subject line. Searchable archives of this newsgroup are available at groups.google.com. On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Meir Hazon wrote: > Hi, > > > Thank you for the quick reply, > How do I get the administrator's interface? > I could not find it in : > http://www.bugzilla.org/docs216/txt/Bugzilla-Guide.txt > > > Thanks Again, > > > Meir. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Christian Robottom Reis [mailto:kiko at async.com.br] > Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 5:45 PM > To: developers at bugzilla.org > Subject: Re: New Objects,Component,Version > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 05:23:00PM +0200, Meir Hazon wrote: > > I have installed bugzilla 2.16.4 , how can I create new > > Objects,Component,Version . > > If I understood your question correctly, this is done using the > administrator interfaces, in particular, editproducts. When logged in as > an administrator, the yellow bar at the bottom of the Bugzilla pages has > a link "products", which takes you there. > > > The documentation is not clear and I guess refers to other versions of > > bugzilla. > > It shouldn't be the case, and if you find something inconsistent, please > file a documentation bug at bugzilla.mozilla.org; we'll fix it for the > next release. > > Take care, > -- > Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 > - > To view or change your list settings, click here: > > - > To view or change your list settings, click here: > > -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron http://www.pyerotechnics.com - - Partner & Sr. Manager Pyerotechnics Development, Inc. - - +1 (443) 451-2697 500 West University Parkway #1S - - +1 (410) 808-6646 (c) Baltimore, Maryland 21210-3253 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, purge the message from your system and notify the sender immediately. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. - To view or change your list settings, click here: From meir.hazon at optier.com Mon Nov 17 16:22:03 2003 From: meir.hazon at optier.com (Meir Hazon) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 18:22:03 +0200 Subject: New Objects,Component,Version [off list] Message-ID: <6146938B30D0D311A48E00508B9B19D901195E9C@MAIL> You are an angel, I got it. Thanks Meir -----Original Message----- From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:jpyeron at pyerotechnics.com] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 6:21 PM To: Meir Hazon Subject: Re: New Objects,Component,Version [off list] when you ran checksetup.pl it asked for a administrator email and password use those to login into it via http://yoursite/bugzilla then the link will appear in the footer ALL PAGES IN BUGZILLA ARE DYNAMIC reading the source code wont help too much unless you have many hours experience with templates or bz ??? index.cfg ??? On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Meir Hazon wrote: > Hi, > > > > I did read it : Bugzilla is configured by changing various parameters, > accessed from > the "Edit parameters" link in the page footer. Here are some of the > key parameters on that page. You should run down this list and set > them appropriately after installing Bugzilla. Etc... > > > I can't find any where in the index.cfg or related links the "Edit > parameters" field. > > I'm sorry for submitting my request to this list, > In the future I will follow your instructions. > > > Thanks, > > > Meir. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:jpyeron at pyerotechnics.com] > Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 6:04 PM > To: 'developers at bugzilla.org' > Subject: Re: New Objects,Component,Version > > RTFM lines 1770-1773, > these question should be posted to the users list. > > > from http://www.bugzilla.org/discussion.html > > > netscape.public.mozilla.webtools - This newsgroup is used for general > discussions of all of the Mozilla Webtools, including Bugzilla, Bonsai, > Tinderbox, etc. This is the best place for Bugzilla users and > administrators of Bugzilla sites to ask for help or share information. > This newsgroup is also gatewayed to a mailing list, > > mozilla-webtools at mozilla.org, > > > which you can subscribe to by mailing > mozilla-webtools-request at mozilla.org and putting "subscribe" in the > subject line. Searchable archives of this newsgroup are available at > groups.google.com. > > > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Meir Hazon wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Thank you for the quick reply, > > How do I get the administrator's interface? > > I could not find it in : > > http://www.bugzilla.org/docs216/txt/Bugzilla-Guide.txt > > > > > > Thanks Again, > > > > > > Meir. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Christian Robottom Reis [mailto:kiko at async.com.br] > > Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 5:45 PM > > To: developers at bugzilla.org > > Subject: Re: New Objects,Component,Version > > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 05:23:00PM +0200, Meir Hazon wrote: > > > I have installed bugzilla 2.16.4 , how can I create new > > > Objects,Component,Version . > > > > If I understood your question correctly, this is done using the > > administrator interfaces, in particular, editproducts. When logged in as > > an administrator, the yellow bar at the bottom of the Bugzilla pages has > > a link "products", which takes you there. > > > > > The documentation is not clear and I guess refers to other versions > of > > > bugzilla. > > > > It shouldn't be the case, and if you find something inconsistent, please > > file a documentation bug at bugzilla.mozilla.org; we'll fix it for the > > next release. > > > > Take care, > > -- > > Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 > > - > > To view or change your list settings, click here: > > > > - > > To view or change your list settings, click here: > > > > > > -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron http://www.pyerotechnics.com - - Partner & Sr. Manager Pyerotechnics Development, Inc. - - +1 (443) 451-2697 500 West University Parkway #1S - - +1 (410) 808-6646 (c) Baltimore, Maryland 21210-3253 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, purge the message from your system and notify the sender immediately. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. From jpyeron at pyerotechnics.com Mon Nov 17 16:45:54 2003 From: jpyeron at pyerotechnics.com (Jason Pyeron) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 11:45:54 -0500 (EST) Subject: bugzilla 3.0... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: There used to be a document which road mapped bz development upto 3.0 the masterplan goes to 2.20, any one know waht I am talking about? Jason Pyeron -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron http://www.pyerotechnics.com - - Partner & Sr. Manager Pyerotechnics Development, Inc. - - +1 (443) 451-2697 500 West University Parkway #1S - - +1 (410) 808-6646 (c) Baltimore, Maryland 21210-3253 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, purge the message from your system and notify the sender immediately. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. From justdave at bugzilla.org Mon Nov 17 17:52:06 2003 From: justdave at bugzilla.org (David Miller) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:52:06 -0500 Subject: bugzilla 3.0... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 11/17/2003 11:45 AM -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote: > There used to be a document which road mapped bz development upto 3.0 > > the masterplan goes to 2.20, any one know waht I am talking about? 3.0 was originally going to be a total rewrite, which was primarily being spearheaded by Ian Hickson. The 2.17.x series has accomplished already over half of the design goals of 3.0 just in the attempt to get it working with mod_perl :) Since Hixie was pretty much the only person working on 3.0 and he hasn't had a lot of time the last couple years anyway, the project has more or less died. Considering what I stated above about 2.17.x, I've been debating some version numbering, and we may decide to change the version of the 2.x line to 3.0 before too long just because the amount of changes and new features have been so huge since 2.16. -- Dave Miller Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System http://www.justdave.net/ http://www.bugzilla.org/ From gerv at mozilla.org Mon Nov 17 17:57:25 2003 From: gerv at mozilla.org (Gervase Markham) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:57:25 +0000 Subject: bugzilla 3.0... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3FB90C05.2070504@mozilla.org> Jason Pyeron wrote: > There used to be a document which road mapped bz development upto 3.0 > > the masterplan goes to 2.20, any one know waht I am talking about? A long time ago, "Bugzilla 3" was a Hixie-driven rewrite of the entire thing, on the basis that the current codebase was far too horrible to contemplate fixing up. Some very general "framework" code got committed to CVS, then Hixie ran out of time and it all ground to a halt. What we have now is the fixed-up version of the un-fixuppable code :-) However, we've kind of got stuck on the 2.X version scheme. Although Hixie's Bugzilla 3 is no more, there are no plans to declare Bugzilla version 3. Perhaps there should be - but what milestone could we pass that would be worthy of the jump? We've done so much in the past in small increments that it might seem odd. Perhaps one of: - full templatisation - running under mod_perl might be suitable... Gerv From jpyeron at pyerotechnics.com Mon Nov 17 18:19:35 2003 From: jpyeron at pyerotechnics.com (Jason Pyeron) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 13:19:35 -0500 (EST) Subject: bugzilla 3.0... In-Reply-To: <3FB90C05.2070504@mozilla.org> Message-ID: On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Gervase Markham wrote: > Jason Pyeron wrote: > > There used to be a document which road mapped bz development upto 3.0 > > > > the masterplan goes to 2.20, any one know waht I am talking about? > > Perhaps there should be - but what milestone could we pass that would be > worthy of the jump? We've done so much in the past in small increments > that it might seem odd. > > Perhaps one of: > - full templatisation > - running under mod_perl > > might be suitable... I ask because we just took on a contract. We have to provide: security acl's for each aspect product/process trees (ie component/subcomponet...) queries on above or subspecs of above customizable state changes (status/resolutions) rich content in the comments (uml/etc) iso 9001 concerns addressed api's for integration with other systems (tightly) salesforce system techsupport / customer service system accounting system enterprise signon system partition / linkage for different classifications of data security none / NDA / sensitive / secret / top secret compartments etc. audit logs on usage / access email intgration, etc... http access / thin client That being said we would like to back port it when it is done. Also we are looking at license models. It boils down to marketing vs development. -jason pyeron -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron http://www.pyerotechnics.com - - Partner & Sr. Manager Pyerotechnics Development, Inc. - - +1 (443) 451-2697 500 West University Parkway #1S - - +1 (410) 808-6646 (c) Baltimore, Maryland 21210-3253 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, purge the message from your system and notify the sender immediately. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. From preed at sigkill.com Mon Nov 17 18:31:18 2003 From: preed at sigkill.com (J. Paul Reed) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:31:18 -0800 Subject: bugzilla 3.0... In-Reply-To: References: <3FB90C05.2070504@mozilla.org> Message-ID: <20031117183118.GA15027@sigkill.com> On 17 Nov 2003 at 13:19:35, Jason Pyeron arranged the bits on my disk to say: > That being said we would like to back port it when it is done. Also we > are looking at license models. It boils down to marketing vs development. Uhm... but aren't you doing all this stuff in Java? So why should it matter what we call the next few releases or what the number is? It would seem to me they're basically different products (and you're not releasing the Java source code, are you? If not, then they're definitely different projects, too). Later, Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------ J. Paul Reed -- 0xDF8708F8 || preed at sigkill.com || web.sigkill.com/preed Math, my dear boy, is nothing more than the lesbian sister of biology. -- Peter Griffin, Family Guy I use PGP; you should use PGP too... if only to piss off John Ashcroft From bugreport at peshkin.net Mon Nov 17 18:39:26 2003 From: bugreport at peshkin.net (Joel Peshkin) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:39:26 -0800 Subject: bugzilla 3.0... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3FB915DE.3080403@peshkin.net> Jason Pyeron wrote: > >I ask because we just took on a contract. > >We have to provide: > > security acl's for each aspect > > product/process trees (ie component/subcomponet...) > queries on above or subspecs of above > > customizable state changes (status/resolutions) > > rich content in the comments (uml/etc) > > iso 9001 concerns addressed > > api's for integration with other systems (tightly) > salesforce system > techsupport / customer service system > accounting system > enterprise signon system > > partition / linkage for different classifications of data security > > none / NDA / sensitive / secret / top secret > compartments etc. > > audit logs on usage / access > > email intgration, etc... > http access / thin client > > >That being said we would like to back port it when it is done. Also we are >looking at license models. It boils down to marketing vs development. > >-jason pyeron > > Jason, That fits very well with my employer's roadmap. I'd suggest developing those against the 2.17 "tip" The interesting features I am contemplating that seems to go in the same direction are.... acls for each aspect (including acls for custom fields) iso9001 considerations addressed (a minimum of root-cause tracking) also a way to link bugs to a corrective action when one is indicated some improvment to the product/component hierarchy tying bug resolutions into a "solution" database. integration with enterprise signon. [both LDAP and Single-signon] Also, permit Bugzilla groups to include groups from external systems [LDAP, other databases...] -Joel From myk at mozilla.org Mon Nov 17 20:58:35 2003 From: myk at mozilla.org (Myk Melez) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:58:35 -0800 Subject: bugzilla 3.0... In-Reply-To: <3FB90C05.2070504@mozilla.org> References: <3FB90C05.2070504@mozilla.org> Message-ID: <3FB9367B.2030009@mozilla.org> Gervase Markham wrote: > Perhaps one of: > - full templatisation > - running under mod_perl I'd also add a good API for third-party clients. -myk From caseyg at chsamerica.com Mon Nov 17 20:52:13 2003 From: caseyg at chsamerica.com (Casey Gregoire) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:52:13 -0500 Subject: bugzilla 3.0... Message-ID: Your email message was temporarily blocked by my spam filter. If you feel this is an error, please follow these instructions. The attached image contains a password. Reply to this email and enter the password in the subject or body of your reply. Thank you. ____________________________________________________ This email account is protected with Spam Bully. www.spambully.com Original email ____________________________________________________ -----Original Message----- From: Myk Melez [mailto:myk at mozilla.org] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 3:59 PM To: developers at bugzilla.org Subject: Re: bugzilla 3.0... Gervase Markham wrote: > Perhaps one of: > - full templatisation > - running under mod_perl I'd also add a good API for third-party clients. -myk - To view or change your list settings, click here: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: JAXFJYXTQVT.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 6488 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jose at invisiondns.com Tue Nov 18 03:58:59 2003 From: jose at invisiondns.com (Jose de Leon) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:58:59 -0800 Subject: bugzilla 3.0... In-Reply-To: <3FB9367B.2030009@mozilla.org> References: <3FB90C05.2070504@mozilla.org> <3FB9367B.2030009@mozilla.org> Message-ID: <3FB99903.6030602@invisiondns.com> As a system integrator, I'll second that request. Myk Melez wrote: > Gervase Markham wrote: > >> Perhaps one of: >> - full templatisation >> - running under mod_perl > > > I'd also add a good API for third-party clients. > > -myk > > > - > To view or change your list settings, click here: > > From ed.fuentetaja at ttu.edu Tue Nov 18 14:35:58 2003 From: ed.fuentetaja at ttu.edu (Fuentetaja, Ed) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:35:58 -0600 Subject: Bugzilla Test Runner Message-ID: <55CA02C1ECF1CB40B2A0AF7B32F0DFDD15F46F@BRONTES.net.ttu.edu> Just want to let this mailing list know that there is a version of Bugzilla Test Runner working with Bugzilla 2.17.4 (I'm always one version behind...) Bugzilla Test Runner is a test case management system that works as an add-on over Bugzilla. I've updated the installation manual and made a .tar for anybody who'd like to give it a try. I've put it together at a crummy web site I maintain: http://www.willowriver.net/products/testrunner.php There is also a running installation that you are welcomed to visit, follow that url for details. Thanks, Ed Fuentetaja From vijayan.reddy at tavant.com Thu Nov 20 12:56:20 2003 From: vijayan.reddy at tavant.com (Vijayan.R.A.Reddy) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:26:20 +0530 Subject: Cookies problem Message-ID: <1069332980.2300.26.camel@tools.india.tavant.com> Hello All, We have a serious problem our customers are facing with our bugzilla installations. * Bugzilla is installed in a local intranet site * It is exposed to customers through an external IP address * External IP address is blocked for internal employees and external customers can not see our intranet bugzilla address (Though both are seeing the same single instance). Now, when a customer files a bug, the bug is filed as another user. Suddenly, this user sees "Logout 's id" on his footer bar, and some of the products are hidden for him as is not authorised to see them. Clearing cookies/deleting offline contents does NOT help (We suspect they are coming through proxy servers). An analysis of "logincookies" table shows that many users are coming In through only 3 IP addresses, and as they all have one machine each (no sharing), obviously the addresses are that of proxy servers. In cases, the same IP is shared between two users. With this context, how does one users cookie goes to another ? And we have offered a temporary solution by deleting the logincookies rows for those userids facing the problem. Curiously, this issue is not found at-all inside our intranet, where there are 300+ users have used it for a longtime and found it reliable. Can someone give us the lead where we should look ? We have Perl programmers on-board and we can fix it, but where ? Thanks, Vijayan. From Madhava_Challa at onsite.satyam.com Thu Nov 20 13:10:31 2003 From: Madhava_Challa at onsite.satyam.com (Madhava_Challa) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 08:10:31 -0500 Subject: Cookies problem Message-ID: <002a01c3af67$ad5818b0$e51a10ac@hts.satyam.com> Yep, We run into this problem everyday within our intra-net... We do have external users using our Bugzilla installation, but never found things criss-crossing with outside users.. Any ideas will be greatly appreciated.. Thanks! Madhava Challa, PMP Director (Delivery), Satyam Computer Services -----Original Message----- From: developers-owner at bugzilla.org [mailto:developers-owner at bugzilla.org]On Behalf Of Vijayan.R.A.Reddy Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 6:26 PM To: developers at bugzilla.org Subject: Cookies problem Hello All, We have a serious problem our customers are facing with our bugzilla installations. * Bugzilla is installed in a local intranet site * It is exposed to customers through an external IP address * External IP address is blocked for internal employees and external customers can not see our intranet bugzilla address (Though both are seeing the same single instance). Now, when a customer files a bug, the bug is filed as another user. Suddenly, this user sees "Logout 's id" on his footer bar, and some of the products are hidden for him as is not authorised to see them. Clearing cookies/deleting offline contents does NOT help (We suspect they are coming through proxy servers). An analysis of "logincookies" table shows that many users are coming In through only 3 IP addresses, and as they all have one machine each (no sharing), obviously the addresses are that of proxy servers. In cases, the same IP is shared between two users. With this context, how does one users cookie goes to another ? And we have offered a temporary solution by deleting the logincookies rows for those userids facing the problem. Curiously, this issue is not found at-all inside our intranet, where there are 300+ users have used it for a longtime and found it reliable. Can someone give us the lead where we should look ? We have Perl programmers on-board and we can fix it, but where ? Thanks, Vijayan. - To view or change your list settings, click here: ************************************************************************** This email (including any attachments) is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient/s and may contain material that is CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVATE COMPANY INFORMATION. Any review or reliance by others or copying or distribution or forwarding of any or all of the contents in this message is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email and delete all copies; your cooperation in this regard is appreciated. ************************************************************************** From kiko at async.com.br Thu Nov 20 13:39:15 2003 From: kiko at async.com.br (Christian Robottom Reis) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:39:15 -0200 Subject: Cookies problem In-Reply-To: <1069332980.2300.26.camel@tools.india.tavant.com> References: <1069332980.2300.26.camel@tools.india.tavant.com> Message-ID: <20031120133915.GB1095@async.com.br> On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 06:26:20PM +0530, Vijayan.R.A.Reddy wrote: > * Bugzilla is installed in a local intranet site > * It is exposed to customers through an external IP address > * External IP address is blocked for internal employees and external > customers can not see our intranet bugzilla address > (Though both are seeing the same single instance). > > Now, when a customer files a bug, the bug is filed as another user. > Suddenly, this user sees "Logout 's id" on his footer bar, > and some of the products are hidden for him as is not > authorised to see them. What version of Bugzilla are you running? Can you tell me if the user sees the correct ID *before* submitting the bug, or is it wrong from the start (i.e., when he enters his password, his ID is already incorrect)? > Clearing cookies/deleting offline contents does NOT help (We suspect > they are coming through proxy servers). This is what confuses me. As far as I can see, the user's login cookie will be sent by his user agent, and I can't see how a proxy would return a request (which carries the cookie) to the wrong user -- proxies don't cache Cookie values, and shouldn't cache Set-Cookie headers either. > An analysis of "logincookies" table shows that many users are coming In > through only 3 IP addresses, and as they all have one machine each (no > sharing), obviously the addresses are that of proxy servers. In cases, > the same IP is shared between two users. How many lines in logincookies correspond to those IP addresses? Each user should have a specific integer login cookie, and they should be dealt out sequentially (at least till bug 119524 is fixed). What you seem to be reporting is a collision -- the same logincookie sent to two users. My limited understanding of the problem points out at least two hypothesis: - we're allocating the same cookie id to two different users, and the second user's cookie overwrites the first one's. I can't see how this can happen, however, because cookie is primary key for logincookies, and the field is autoincrementing. - the second user is receiving a cached Set-Cookie value. Specifically where this caching is hapenning is up for grabs, and I can't really speculate on this. > Curiously, this issue is not found at-all inside our intranet, where > there are 300+ users have used it for a longtime and found it reliable. Probably because the IP addresses are unique inside the intranet, or because there is no caching involved. Take care, -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 From vijayan.reddy at tavant.com Thu Nov 20 13:49:58 2003 From: vijayan.reddy at tavant.com (Vijayan.R.A.Reddy) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:19:58 +0530 Subject: Cookies problem In-Reply-To: <20031120133915.GB1095@async.com.br> References: <1069332980.2300.26.camel@tools.india.tavant.com> <20031120133915.GB1095@async.com.br> Message-ID: <1069336198.2300.42.camel@tools.india.tavant.com> Please find my responses interspersed. On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 19:09, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 06:26:20PM +0530, Vijayan.R.A.Reddy wrote: > > * Bugzilla is installed in a local intranet site > > * It is exposed to customers through an external IP address > > * External IP address is blocked for internal employees and external > > customers can not see our intranet bugzilla address > > (Though both are seeing the same single instance). > > > > Now, when a customer files a bug, the bug is filed as another user. > > Suddenly, this user sees "Logout 's id" on his footer bar, > > and some of the products are hidden for him as is not > > authorised to see them. > > What version of Bugzilla are you running? 2.16.3 > Can you tell me if the user sees the correct ID *before* submitting the > bug, or is it wrong from the start (i.e., when he enters his password, > his ID is already incorrect)? I fear these users dont log off often, so the typical usage scenario is, customer opens the browser, types in the URL, then goes on to file a bug, so when he says commit, it goes in someone else's name. No, the users dont share machines, nor do they share NT/Windows login accounts, they dont use dumb terminals, and they are behind a proxy. > > Clearing cookies/deleting offline contents does NOT help (We suspect > > they are coming through proxy servers). > > This is what confuses me. As far as I can see, the user's login cookie > will be sent by his user agent, and I can't see how a proxy would return > a request (which carries the cookie) to the wrong user -- proxies don't > cache Cookie values, and shouldn't cache Set-Cookie headers either. > > > An analysis of "logincookies" table shows that many users are coming In > > through only 3 IP addresses, and as they all have one machine each (no > > sharing), obviously the addresses are that of proxy servers. In cases, > > the same IP is shared between two users. > > How many lines in logincookies correspond to those IP addresses? About 70, for 3 users, and yesterday, we deleted all contents in logincookies table for these three users. When a single user logged-in (we were monitoring), it generated 3 rows in the logincookies table. > Each user should have a specific integer login cookie, and they should > be dealt out sequentially (at least till bug 119524 is fixed). What you > seem to be reporting is a collision -- the same logincookie sent to two > users. My limited understanding of the problem points out at least two > hypothesis: No. The cookie IDs in the logincookies table are all unique. No collision here. > - we're allocating the same cookie id to two different users, and > the second user's cookie overwrites the first one's. I can't see > how this can happen, however, because cookie is primary key for > logincookies, and the field is autoincrementing. > > - the second user is receiving a cached Set-Cookie value. > Specifically where this caching is hapenning is up for grabs, and > I can't really speculate on this. Yes, this is what we speculated too. Thanks, Vijayan. > > Curiously, this issue is not found at-all inside our intranet, where > > there are 300+ users have used it for a longtime and found it reliable. > > Probably because the IP addresses are unique inside the intranet, or > because there is no caching involved. > > Take care, > -- > Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 > - > To view or change your list settings, click here: > From liora.almashanu at weizmann.ac.il Thu Nov 20 20:25:38 2003 From: liora.almashanu at weizmann.ac.il (liora strichman-almashanu) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:25:38 -0500 Subject: select lists for asigning instead of free text Message-ID: We have a small group of people using Bugzilla-2.16.4 on a unix machine. We'd like to have a select list of people from the group (in a pull down menu) instead of free text- in all the fields which require adding users (such as asigning, reasigning, ccing etc.) How do I change this? From kiko at async.com.br Fri Nov 21 11:38:29 2003 From: kiko at async.com.br (Christian Robottom Reis) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:38:29 -0200 Subject: select lists for asigning instead of free text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20031121113829.GD753@async.com.br> On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 03:25:38PM -0500, liora strichman-almashanu wrote: > We have a small group of people using Bugzilla-2.16.4 on a unix > machine. We'd like to have a select list of people from the group (in a > pull down menu) instead of free text- in all the fields which require > adding users (such as asigning, reasigning, ccing etc.) > How do I change this? We don't support this out of the box, but I'm almost sure there's a bug filed on the issue. Unless you want all users to show up in the select list, you'll need to find a way of filtering the users in a way that suits you, add a database call to pull them, and display them in bug/edit.html/tmpl with a SELECT. Shouldn't be too much work. Take care, -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 From kiko at async.com.br Fri Nov 21 11:42:22 2003 From: kiko at async.com.br (Christian Robottom Reis) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:42:22 -0200 Subject: Cookies problem In-Reply-To: <1069336198.2300.42.camel@tools.india.tavant.com> References: <1069332980.2300.26.camel@tools.india.tavant.com> <20031120133915.GB1095@async.com.br> <1069336198.2300.42.camel@tools.india.tavant.com> Message-ID: <20031121114222.GE753@async.com.br> On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 07:19:58PM +0530, Vijayan.R.A.Reddy wrote: > > Can you tell me if the user sees the correct ID *before* submitting the > > bug, or is it wrong from the start (i.e., when he enters his password, > > his ID is already incorrect)? > > I fear these users dont log off often, so the typical usage scenario is, > customer opens the browser, types in the URL, then goes on to file a > bug, so when he says commit, it goes in someone else's name. Nobody logs off, ever :-) That would make sense -- they aren't authenticating at all, just reusing a cookie. But the enter_bug page shows the login name at the page footer; it would be great to find out if it's already wrong when they hit the first URL, or only after commit. One thing I'm interested in knowing is if, when explicitly logging in, the user is correctly identified as himself in the page footer. > No, the users dont share machines, nor do they share NT/Windows login > accounts, they dont use dumb terminals, and they are behind a proxy. Unless they share machines, it has to be a bizarre instance of wrong set-cookie being received, or a cached cookie being sent *to* bugzilla (but a cached header with the correct bug report information has to be impossible). But they don't seem to be receiving set-cookie lines at all, since it should only be sent when logging in, and as you said, they're all already logged in. > When a single user logged-in (we were monitoring), it generated 3 rows > in the logincookies table. 3 rows with the same userid? > > - the second user is receiving a cached Set-Cookie value. > > Specifically where this caching is hapenning is up for grabs, and > > I can't really speculate on this. > > Yes, this is what we speculated too. By the way, you should upgrade, 2.16.4 is out :-) Take care, -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 From sr at stephenreindl.de Fri Nov 21 12:54:21 2003 From: sr at stephenreindl.de (Stephen Reindl) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:54:21 +0100 (CET) Subject: Bug 266351 - Problems with internal server error in case of resend in buglist.cgi Message-ID: <1271.195.233.250.7.1069419261.squirrel@sreindl.dyndns.org> Hi all, I have problems with server push functionality. With Mozilla 1.4.1 I get sometimes (approx 1 out of 5 times) at a refresh an internal server error. In the error log I see something like (after enabling debug mode) [Wed Nov 19 22:24:50 2003] [info] (32)Broken pipe: core_output_filter: writing data to the network [Wed Nov 19 22:24:51 2003] [error] [client 80.132.202.166] malformed header from script. Bad header=HTTP/1.1 200 OK: buglist.cgi I'm using apache 2.0.48 bugzilla latest CVS (including bug 226249) Regards Stephen -- ------------------- Stephen Reindl sr at stephenreindl.de From bugreport at peshkin.net Fri Nov 21 14:14:10 2003 From: bugreport at peshkin.net (Joel Peshkin) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 06:14:10 -0800 Subject: RFC: New derived field definitions Message-ID: <3FBE1DB2.5020505@peshkin.net> I have been looking for ways to enable Bugzilla's standard query mechanism to identify bugs that have not progressed. This would be the basis for queries run by managers to identify where they need to intervene and for future enhanced whining reports. The ones I can think of are..... "days since last reassigned" "days since (commented on or status updated) by assignee" etc.... It seems that there must be a way to do this in a general case without excessively clutterng the UI. Unfortunately, that way is not jumping out at me. Ideas? Comments? -Joel From kiko at async.com.br Fri Nov 21 17:04:20 2003 From: kiko at async.com.br (Christian Robottom Reis) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 15:04:20 -0200 Subject: RFC: New derived field definitions In-Reply-To: <3FBE1DB2.5020505@peshkin.net> References: <3FBE1DB2.5020505@peshkin.net> Message-ID: <20031121170420.GA1578@async.com.br> On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 06:14:10AM -0800, Joel Peshkin wrote: > The ones I can think of are..... > > "days since last reassigned" > "days since (commented on or status updated) by assignee" > etc.... > > It seems that there must be a way to do this in a general case without > excessively clutterng the UI. Unfortunately, that way is not jumping > out at me. An approach is to have a "manager's corner" page, which has pre-cooked queries with very limited parametrization that you can just click-n-see. It could be categorized in some way, and would be a way to get users that aren't so form-proficient to find what they want at minimum hassle. The query page is really for developers and QA, IMHO -- most users have simpler needs (as the bug entry wizard shows) and less time to learn the interface (c.f. Nielsen's work on average time per task on the Web and the importance of brain-dead easy UI for the average user). It's a good way to present high-level queries such as "Progress made this week" and "Bugs closed in version X". We have something like this at BMO (okay, not for manager's, which indicates that perhaps manager's corner isn't the best analogy) on the frontpage, with the "bugs reported today" link. Take care, -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 From kiko at async.com.br Fri Nov 21 17:41:36 2003 From: kiko at async.com.br (Christian Robottom Reis) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 15:41:36 -0200 Subject: Bug 266351 - Problems with internal server error in case of resend in buglist.cgi In-Reply-To: <1271.195.233.250.7.1069419261.squirrel@sreindl.dyndns.org> References: <1271.195.233.250.7.1069419261.squirrel@sreindl.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <20031121174136.GC1578@async.com.br> On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 01:54:21PM +0100, Stephen Reindl wrote: > [Wed Nov 19 22:24:50 2003] [info] (32)Broken pipe: core_output_filter: > writing data to the network > [Wed Nov 19 22:24:51 2003] [error] [client 80.132.202.166] malformed > header from script. Bad header=HTTP/1.1 200 OK: buglist.cgi Could it be that something is being output in buglist.cgi *before* the HTTP/1.1 line? It's sounds pretty weird. Does it happen with all user agents, Stephen? The bug #, for reference, is bug 226251 and it's currently duped to 226249. Take care, -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 From bruce.armstrong at teamsybase.com Fri Nov 21 18:24:27 2003 From: bruce.armstrong at teamsybase.com (Bruce Armstrong [TeamSybase]) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:24:27 -0800 (PST) Subject: select lists for asigning instead of free text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20031121182427.9253.qmail@web12505.mail.yahoo.com> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52557 liora strichman-almashanu wrote:We have a small group of people using Bugzilla-2.16.4 on a unix machine. We'd like to have a select list of people from the group (in a pull down menu) instead of free text- in all the fields which require adding users (such as asigning, reasigning, ccing etc.) How do I change this? - To view or change your list settings, click here: Bruce Armstrong [TeamSybase] --------------------------------- http://www.teamsybase.com Preach the gospel at all times. If necessary, use words. -- Francis of Assisi http://www.needhim.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sr at stephenreindl.de Sat Nov 22 10:04:46 2003 From: sr at stephenreindl.de (Stephen Reindl) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 11:04:46 +0100 Subject: Bug 266251 - Problems with internal server error in case of In-Reply-To: <20031121174136.GC1578@async.com.br> References: <1271.195.233.250.7.1069419261.squirrel@sreindl.dyndns.org> <20031121174136.GC1578@async.com.br> Message-ID: <1069495485.13040.5.camel@yedi> This happens to mozilla only. If I'm connecting trough MSIE from the office, this doesn't happen. It seems to be something with the server push functionality because as described in the issue, this doesn't happen in this case. ... and it's 266251 of course ... Regards Stephen Am Fr, den 21.11.2003 schrieb Christian Robottom Reis um 18:41: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 01:54:21PM +0100, Stephen Reindl wrote: > > [Wed Nov 19 22:24:50 2003] [info] (32)Broken pipe: core_output_filter: > > writing data to the network > > [Wed Nov 19 22:24:51 2003] [error] [client 80.132.202.166] malformed > > header from script. Bad header=HTTP/1.1 200 OK: buglist.cgi > > Could it be that something is being output in buglist.cgi *before* the > HTTP/1.1 line? It's sounds pretty weird. > > Does it happen with all user agents, Stephen? > > The bug #, for reference, is bug 226251 and it's currently duped to > 226249. > > Take care, > -- > Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 > - > To view or change your list settings, click here: >