more flexibility?...

David Miller justdave at syndicomm.com
Thu Jul 24 08:02:44 UTC 2003


For anyone else on the list looking for it, it got duped to bug 101179.

http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101179

On 7/23/2003 3:49 PM -0400, Jason Pyeron wrote:

> moving this into bugzilla then
>
> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213585
>
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, vladd wrote:
>
>> Sounds good to me.
>>
>> Vlad D.
>>
>> On Wednesday 23 July 2003 07:07 pm, you wrote:
>> > Developers,
>> >
>> > In my morning meeting we were talking about storage of finite-state
>> > automata in a RDBMS / XML setting. This got me thinking about how bugzilla
>> > has "hardcoded" status and status change rules.
>> >
>> > How receptive would the community be to storing these rules in the
>> > database? This could lead to a more versatile Bugzilla, since new states
>> > could be added with rules (w/o hacking code)
>> >
>> >
>> > Sincerely,
>> >
>> > Jason Pyeron

-- 
Dave Miller      Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System
http://www.justdave.net/             http://www.bugzilla.org/



More information about the developers mailing list