Support for multiple "Locations" in bugzilla

Chris L. Mason cmason at
Fri Feb 28 21:09:19 UTC 2003

On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 08:54:47PM +0000, Gervase Markham wrote:
> Chris L. Mason wrote:
> >I'd appreciate any 
> >suggestions you might have for me to help make this more likely.  :)
> I hope this isn't too disappointing, but I don't think there's much 
> chance of either of these getting in. For all the fuss we are making 
> about custom fields, that _is_ the right way to solve this problem, and 
> I'm sure someone will get around to implementing them before too long. 
> But in the mean time, we don't want to do anything which will make the 
> job harder - and more fixed fields means that. Particularly given that 
> you are the first person to ask for the two fields you are using, so 
> they probably don't have wide applicability.

Fair enough.  What's the main problem with the custom fields patch?
What's holding it back from being merged into the tree?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the developers mailing list