[Q] Bugzilla 2.16.2 on MacOSX Server 10.2.3
justdave at syndicomm.com
Thu Feb 6 19:33:52 UTC 2003
On 2/6/03 6:56 PM +1100, Bradley Baetz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:41:06PM -0500, Dave Miller wrote:
>> Ended up deciding that DBI 1.32 doesn't like Perl 5.6.0. I tried it on a
>> Linux box I had with Perl 5.6.0 on it with the same results (taint error in
>> the t/10examp.t test). Specifically installing DBI 1.31 worked. Of
>> course, he's using 2.16.2, so he can get away with that. Bugzilla 2.17.x
>> requires DBI 1.32. Does this mean we now need to require Perl 5.6.1 for
>> Bugzilla or is this something that'll get fixed in a future DBI?
> The taint tests were disabled in 1.31, so that won't help you. :)
> What specifically fails? I wrote the Taint patches for DBI, so...
> The tests are a bit hacky, though, so it could just be a test bug.
t/10examp..............ok 103/245Insecure dependency in parameter 1 of
DBI::st=HASH(0x20442c)->FETCH method call while running with -T switch at
t/10examp.t line 320.
DBI handle cleared whilst still active.
dbih_clearcom (sth 0x20563c 0x10be40, com 0x1f6c10, imp DBD::ExampleP::st):
FLAGS 0x60011: COMSET Warn TaintIn TaintOut
KIDS 0 (0 Active)
Test returned status 20 (wstat 5120, 0x1400)
Dave Miller Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System
More information about the developers