[Q] Bugzilla 2.16.2 on MacOSX Server 10.2.3

David Miller justdave at syndicomm.com
Thu Feb 6 19:33:52 UTC 2003

On 2/6/03 6:56 PM +1100, Bradley Baetz wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:41:06PM -0500, Dave Miller wrote:
>> Ended up deciding that DBI 1.32 doesn't like Perl 5.6.0.  I tried it on a
>> Linux box I had with Perl 5.6.0 on it with the same results (taint error in
>> the t/10examp.t test).  Specifically installing DBI 1.31 worked.  Of
>> course, he's using 2.16.2, so he can get away with that.  Bugzilla 2.17.x
>> requires DBI 1.32.  Does this mean we now need to require Perl 5.6.1 for
>> Bugzilla or is this something that'll get fixed in a future DBI?
> The taint tests were disabled in 1.31, so that won't help you. :)
> What specifically fails? I wrote the Taint patches for DBI, so...
> The tests are a bit hacky, though, so it could just be a test bug.

t/10examp..............ok 103/245Insecure dependency in parameter 1 of
DBI::st=HASH(0x20442c)->FETCH method call while running with -T switch at
t/10examp.t line 320.
DBI handle cleared whilst still active.
    dbih_clearcom (sth 0x20563c 0x10be40, com 0x1f6c10, imp DBD::ExampleP::st):
       FLAGS 0x60011: COMSET Warn TaintIn TaintOut
       PARENT DBI::db=HASH(0x1cbeec)
       KIDS 0 (0 Active)
       IMP_DATA ARRAY(0x20587c)
       NUM_OF_FIELDS 3
       NUM_OF_PARAMS 1
        Test returned status 20 (wstat 5120, 0x1400)

Dave Miller      Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System
http://www.justdave.net/             http://www.bugzilla.org/

More information about the developers mailing list