Whats the status on customfields?

[Gervase Markham]

Stuart Donaldson wrote:
> As many others have pointed out, there is a need for some level of 
> custom field support. 
> What is the current status of custom fields, and in particular getting 
> custom fields into a supported case? 

All the details are in the bug. So I think the situation is probably the 
same as ever. This has not yet reached the top of anyone's priority list.

> I recall someone suggesting a new 
> approach was needed rather than the one taken in the custom fields 
> patch.  Is anything going on here?

There's been some implementation discussion, but I don't know if a 
consensus was reached.

Gerv