tobias.burnus at physik.fu-berlin.de
Tue Dec 9 14:44:33 UTC 2003
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:57:40PM +0000, Gervase Markham wrote:
> Hmm. We appear to have forgotten about our cunning scheme for template
> versioning. (See http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140527)
> So what's the plan? Do we do an assessment before the 2.18 release and
> bump the version numbers appropriately on every template? Sort of the
> "big bang" approach?
As a translator, I really would like to see this. But one has to ensure
that the version data is always updated.
Otherwise automatic solutions (w/o having this nice major/minor
distinction) have some pros (e.g. CVS's '$Revision$'/'$Revision: 1.1 $').
Setting all changed templates (= all?) to 2.0 or to
2.0/1.1 would be fine with me.
More information about the developers