What lies ahead

[Gervase Markham]

J. Paul Reed wrote:
> On 25 Apr 2003 at 14:17:08, Gervase Markham moved bits on my disk to say:
> 
>>Without wanting to sound like a broken record, 
> 
> Then please stop reminding us. *I* hate to bring it up, but there *were*
> people other than me who didn't agree with your solution and/or design 

I am not arguing that we should use my patch; I was merely using it to 
prove my point that the requirements of 84876 could be achieved without 
templatisation work.

> and
> who couldn't understand your obsession with Mail::Bulkmail, especially when
> we're not sending "bulkmail" 

...but we are sending a lot of mail, which is why the module is thus 
named. Discounting it because of its name, rather than its function, 
always seemed odd to me. But never mind.

 > (This is not an invitation to start up that discussion
> again, BTW). But don't paint the picture that I'm the "lone obstacle" to
> your patch for 84876.

You place "lone obstacle" in quotes, but they are not a quote from me. 
Please do not falsely attribute motives or opinions to me.

> It looks like there's already a separate bug for mail templatization: bug
> 100089. 

Fab. :-)

Gerv