What lies ahead

[Gervase Markham]

J. Paul Reed wrote:
> On 25 Apr 2003 at 08:52:13, Gervase Markham moved bits on my disk to say:
> 
>>No, please don't do that! :-) IMO the best thing is to get a working
>>patch in for the current scope of 84876 ASAP.
> 
> The problem is, the patch for the first part will most likely involve
> templates... 

There's no reason why this should be true. Without wanting to sound like 
a broken record, check my patch for a way to implement the requirements 
of 84876 without doing any templatisation.

Gerv