MySQL user's Conference

[Myk Melez]

Bradley Baetz wrote:

>I have this vague recollection that its [bmo] a 4G machine, but I'm not
>too sure.
>  
>
That's right.  I did some tuning at one point based on the "huge" 
example, but it didn't seem to do much good.

>>For GCC, our attachments are mainly huge preprocessed source files, so  
>>it helps quite a bit.
>>We get about a 70% reduction in attachment size.
>>    
>>
>
>Yeah, it would help with the size, but since its on a separate table
>which we really don't look at that often I don't think it would save
>anything apart from diskspace.
>  
>
Except that we do look at it a lot for request queue queries.

-myk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bugzilla.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20030418/41034181/attachment.html>