New custom fields proposal

[David Miller]

On 4/10/03 6:03 PM +1000, Bradley Baetz wrote:

>> >Currently, we 'allow' any of those, and rely on the db to not prseent
>> >any matches. Thats not portable, so whatever we so with that will depend
>> >on how we solve teh generic value/
>>
>> I don't understand.  Can you elaborate?
>
> We allow searchs for '<string-field> after <date-val>' for example, and
> that just returns false in mysql.

And returns an SQL type mismatch error in Sybase, hence the "not portable"
comment a couple replies back. :)
-- 
Dave Miller      Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System
http://www.justdave.net/             http://www.bugzilla.org/