gerv at mozilla.org
Fri Sep 13 18:02:16 UTC 2002
>>Rewrite of graphing so that you can graph anything (but not
>>retrospectively). This also involves moving the graphing parameters and
>>results into the database.
> Why not retrospectivly? We have a patch for collectstats + regeneration
> sitting in bugzilla...
Which I reviewed and everyone else has ignored :-) Although now we are
on single-reviews, I could check it in - but I have no idea of its
status. MattyT's point is perhaps a valid one - we've had corruption
bugs in that table. But then, maybe people only care to within a few
bugs what the values are.
> Why can't custres be checked in before this? The other way arround would
> proably be painful, but getting the current charting to work with custres
> would just involve some resolution_id_to_name calls somewhere
The resolution names are hard-coded into the datafile. :-(
More information about the developers