Gervase Markham gerv at
Fri Oct 25 17:52:11 UTC 2002

> I fail to see how this justifies not receiving peer review.  Peer review
> is at the core of the good volunteer projects and is why they produce
> good software.  The logical extension of your argument is to never talk
> about designs at all, since someone might complain and bog the bug down.
> It is not "design by committee" if someone holds a big stick and is
> willing to use it quickly. 
<more good arguments>

What he said :-)

This list should be notified, at least, of major upcoming changes, so 
that those who have the time and inclination can read the bug, provide 
input, and review the code. IMO, Joel's "groups landing patch" mail is 
an excellent example of the sort of things we should see :-)


More information about the developers mailing list