l10n + custom fields

[Bradley Baetz]

On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, David Miller wrote:

> > I want to get rid of fielddefs entirely :)
> 
> Fielddefs is necessary because of the mapping in the activity table. :(
> Unless we make yet more schema changes to the activity table...

Well, we need a mapping, thats true. What I meant to say was that I want 
to get rid of the current impl (the boolean for 'should display in mail 
for New bugs' is just Wrong)

Bradley