Email patches?! Where the *&$#& is Paul?!!! was Re: Custom fields

[J. Paul Reed]

On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Gervase Markham wrote:

> 84876 is not only easier to finish, but also blocks more stuff (it blocks
> mail templatisation, for a start, which is a really big job.  124174 is
> larger, and blocks Win32, which has a whole load of other blockers too.
>
> If anyone disagrees, let's hear it, but I for one would prefer that you
> made 84876 your number 1 priority, or handed it off to another developer.

Which do you want?

http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr/domain=bugzilla.org?list=developers&func=archive-get-part&extra=200210/97

I'm inclined to agree with bbaetz
(http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr/domain=bugzilla.org?list=developers&func=archive-get-part&extra=200210/95)
on this one, mainly because 127174 is mostly done, is a (big) perf one, has
no controversy, and at least gives the illusion that we care about and are
working on Win32 ;-)

Later,
Paul
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  J. Paul Reed                 preed at sigkill.com || web.sigkill.com/preed
  Wait, stop!  We can outsmart those dolphins.  Don't forget: we invented
  computers, leg warmers, bendy straws, peel-and-eat shrimp, the glory
  hole, *and* the pudding cup!  -- Homer Simpson, Tree House of Horror XI