<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Bill Barry wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid45ACDD28.6060208@gmail.com" type="cite"><br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">2. a contrib patch to allow secure
authenticated inbound emails
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
This doesn't have to be contrib. I already have code that does
<br>
this, I just have to wait for copyright release on it. We have already
<br>
planned to do this.
<br>
</blockquote>
How would you do this? Client certs? GPG?
<br>
I have a script that will allow inbound email from the inside of our
network (it works very much like fetchmail, in fact I bet it could be
replaced with fetchmail), but it doesn't authenticate in any way. An
authentication mechanism that anyone can use without getting in the way
of normal email sending/recieving (through outlook and exchange) would
be awesome (I could open the script up to the outside) but I haven't
figured out how to do it.
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">3. better use of the header links section
(I think your own saved searches should go there:
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Some people have 50 saved searches.
<br>
</blockquote>
So have the ability to show your saved searches in the header and/or
footer in user prefs.
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">5. display the version in the footer on
every page (pref bottom right
<br>
in a float box that takes up no height)
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
It's already in the header. Are you looking at bmo instead of
<br>
actual upstream?
<br>
</blockquote>
Because I have replaced it in the header with a searchbox, I moved it
to the footer. The header is much more valuable space than the footer
and should be wisely used.
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
Hi Max,<br>
<br>
I was just thinking - for those that have a high number of saved
searches, it might be useful to allow the user to specify that they
want their searches in a pull-down menu rather than taking up so much
space in the "saved searches" section of the header/footer. That would
save a bunch of space and still keep it at the top where it's most
likely to be used / needed. It would probably be best if users can
configure whether or not they see their saved searches in a pull-down
and whether or not they appear in the header, footer, or both. Of
course, brainstorming a bit, it might also be nice if users could group
their saved searches so they would not only appear in a certain order,
but if pull-downs are enabled, multiple pull-downs could be offered.<br>
<br>
Kevin<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<img src="cid:part1.01050907.05090305@amd.com" border="0"></div>
</body>
</html>