Hi,<br><br>Not sure I'm allowed to say anything on this mailling list (feel free to put me in my place), but there's a section in the Developer's Guide that should probably be updated with whatever is decided here:<br><br>
_______snip________<br>While Bugzilla uses Javascript and cookies to make the user experience
easier, no patch to Bugzilla should <em>require</em> either. The only
exception is that the administrative interfaces (the edit* CGIs) may
require JavaScript, as we expect the administrator to have a
JavaScript-capable browser.<br>------------------------------------<br><a href="http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/developer.html">http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/developer.html</a><br>
<br><br>-Jeff<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 3/1/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">David Miller</b> <<a href="mailto:justdave@bugzilla.org">justdave@bugzilla.org</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Myk Melez wrote on 3/1/06 4:40 PM:<br><br>> I suggest we drop the requirement to support these browsers but allow<br>> developers to continue to implement such support if they want it or have<br>> users who want it. This way we place the onus for supporting these
<br>> browsers on the folks for whom they matter instead of making everyone<br>> pay the tax for this tiny minority of users.<br><br>Works for me. We know timeless will do it anyway, he's the one who cares ;)<br><br>
--<br>Dave Miller <a href="http://www.justdave.net/">http://www.justdave.net/</a><br>System Administrator, Mozilla Corporation <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/">http://www.mozilla.com/
</a><br>Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System <a href="http://www.bugzilla.org/">http://www.bugzilla.org/</a><br>-<br>To view or change your list settings, click here:<br><<a href="http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=engine@gmail.com">
http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=engine@gmail.com</a>><br></blockquote></div><br>