<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
I think this would be great. It would enable people to ie. try out the<br>
time-tracking features.<br>
<br>
It can also assist in corporate decisions for bug-tracking systems<br>
if there is a full-blown demo-system running.<br>
<br>
<br>
regards,<br>
Andreas<br>
<br>
Gervase Markham wrote:<br>
<blockquote cite="mid4006EFD5.4090409@mozilla.org" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type"
content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<title>Proper test installation?</title>
<p> I had an idea while doing the docs: </p>
<p> How about another Bugzilla installation on Landfill: <br>
<a href="http://landfill.bugzilla.org/demo/">http://landfill.bugzilla.org/demo/</a>
</p>
<p> It would run the tip, but differ from bugzilla-tip/ in one key
respect: <br>
there would be a clean database with a few sensible bugs in various <br>
states, a few accounts, products and components with sensible-looking <br>
default owners (but listed in "nomail"), a decent history of reporting <br>
data - i.e. a typical "small Bugzilla" - which it would reset to every <br>
weekend. So user accounts and bug changes would be removed. </p>
<p> Additionally, unlike bugzilla-tip, it would have all features
enabled. </p>
<p>Is this worth having? Is it too much work? What do people think? </p>
<p> Gerv <br>
- <br>
To view or change your list settings, click here: <br>
<<a
href="http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=andreas.hoefler@bearingpoint.com">http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=andreas.hoefler@bearingpoint.com</a>>
</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>