Release schedule plans

[Jake]

Gervase Markham wrote:

> I don't like the sound of that at all. Currently we are managing 
> three, and it's more than enough. I'd argue this is a reason to either 
> extend the development cycle or shorten the support cycle.


I have to agree with this, though I don't think shorten the support 
cycle is the right answer. I wonder if a 9 or even 12 month release 
cycle might be better suited for us.