HTML 4.01 transitional compliance

Tue Sep 2 09:49:52 UTC 2003

On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 07:07:13PM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
> -On [20030901 08:42], Bradley Baetz (bbaetz at acm.org) wrote:
> >_ wasn't valid as an ID in CSS, but then it
> >was changed via an errata. Its possible that
> >your software hasn't picked that up.
> 
> Can you find me that reference?  I haven't been able to find anything on
> that.

http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/REC-CSS2-19980512-errata.html#x3

Bradley